cocteau twins: live 1990

"A rare nostalgia moment: i didnt think any footage from the Heaven or Las Vegas tour in 1990 existed and i remember how cool it was being able to have a lighting designer for the first time that tour but have never seen how our stage looked from the audience till tonight so this is a treat to me. The whole concert in on youtube now pretty much. And my god, what a voice Elizabeth had on this tour, absolutely perfect on every song. Some rare good memories."
— Simon Raymonde, bassist

pura joya


Setlist:

Blue Bell Knoll
From the Flagstones
Iceblink Luck
Orange Appled
Wolf in the Breast
Crushed
Pitch the Baby
Cherry Coloured Funk
Road, River and Rail
A Kissed Out Red Floatboat
Heaven or Las Vegas
Aikea Guinea
Pink Orange Red

Encore:

Whales’ Tails
Mizake the Mizan

una cita real de william gibson:

If you’d gone to a publisher in 1981 with a proposal for a science-fiction novel that consisted of a really clear and simple description of the world today, they’d have read your proposal and said, Well, it’s impossible. This is ridiculous. This doesn’t even make any sense. Granted, you have half a dozen powerful and really excellent plot drivers for that many science-fiction n­ovels, but you can’t have them all in one novel.

INTERVIEWER

What are those major plot drivers?

GIBSON

Fossil fuels have been discovered to be destabilizing the planet’s climate, with possibly drastic consequences. There’s an epidemic, highly contagious, lethal sexual disease that destroys the human immune system, raging virtually uncontrolled throughout much of Africa. New York has been attacked by Islamist fundamentalists, who have destroyed the two tallest buildings in the city, and the United States in response has invaded Afghanistan and Iraq.

INTERVIEWER

And you haven’t even gotten to the technology.

GIBSON

You haven’t even gotten to the Internet. By the time you were telling about the Internet, they’d be showing you the door. It’s just too much science fiction.

IT’S PROBABLY NOT a good idea to take too personal an interest in your microbes. Louis Pasteur, the great French chemist and bacteriologist, became so preoccupied with them that he took to peering critically at every dish placed before him with a magnifying glass, a habit that presumably did not win him many repeat invitations to dinner.

In fact, there is no point in trying to hide from your bacteria, for they are on and around you always, in numbers you can’t conceive. If you are in good health and averagely diligent about hygiene, you will have a herd of about one trillion bacteria grazing on your fleshy plains—about a hundred thousand of them on every square centimeter of skin. They are there to dine off the ten billion or so flakes of skin you shed every day, plus all the tasty oils and fortifying minerals that seep out from every pore and fissure. You are for them the ultimate food court, with the convenience of warmth and constant mobility thrown in. By way of thanks, they give you B.O.
And those are just the bacteria that inhabit your skin. There are trillions more tucked away in your gut and nasal passages, clinging to your hair and eyelashes, swimming over the surface of your eyes, drilling through the enamel of your teeth. Your digestive system alone is host to more than a hundred trillion microbes, of at least four hundred types. Some deal with sugars, some with starches, some attack other bacteria. A surprising number, like the ubiquitous intestinal spirochetes, have no detectable function at all. They just seem to like to be with you. Every human body consists of about 10 quadrillion cells, but about 100 quadrillion bacterial cells. They are, in short, a big part of us. From the bacteria’s point of view, of course, we are a rather small part of them.

Because we humans are big and clever enough to produce and utilize antibiotics and disinfectants, it is easy to convince ourselves that we have banished bacteria to the fringes of existence. Don’t you believe it. Bacteria may not build cities or have interesting social lives, but they will be here when the Sun explodes. This is their planet, and we are on it only because they allow us to be.
Bacteria, never forget, got along for billions of years without us. We couldn’t survive a day without them. They process our wastes and make them usable again; without their diligent munching nothing would rot. They purify our water and keep our soils productive. Bacteria synthesize vitamins in our gut, convert the things we eat into useful sugars and polysaccharides, and go to war on alien microbes that slip down our gullet.

We depend totally on bacteria to pluck nitrogen from the air and convert it into useful nucleotides and amino acids for us. It is a prodigious and gratifying feat. As Margulis and Sagan note, to do the same thing industrially (as when making fertilizers) manufacturers must heat the source materials to 500 degrees centigrade and squeeze them to three hundred times normal pressures. Bacteria do it all the time without fuss, and thank goodness, for no larger organism could survive without the nitrogen they pass on. Above all, microbes continue to provide us with the air we breathe and to keep the atmosphere stable. Microbes, including the modern versions of cyanobacteria, supply the greater part of the planet’s breathable oxygen. Algae and other tiny organisms bubbling away in the sea blow out about 150 billion kilos of the stuff every year.

And they are amazingly prolific. The more frantic among them can yield a new generation in less than ten minutes; Clostridium perfringens, the disagreeable little organism that causes gangrene, can reproduce in nine minutes. At such a rate, a single bacterium could theoretically produce more offspring in two days than there are protons in the universe. “Given an adequate supply of nutrients, a single bacterial cell can generate 280,000 billion individuals in a single day,” according to the Belgian biochemist and Nobel laureate Christian de Duve. In the same period, a human cell can just about manage a single division.

About once every million divisions, they produce a mutant. Usually this is bad luck for the mutant—change is always risky for an organism—but just occasionally the new bacterium is endowed with some accidental advantage, such as the ability to elude or shrug off an attack of antibiotics. With this ability to evolve rapidly goes another, even scarier advantage. Bacteria share information. Any bacterium can take pieces of genetic coding from any other. Essentially, as Margulis and Sagan put it, all bacteria swim in a single gene pool. Any adaptive change that occurs in one area of the bacterial universe can spread to any other. It’s rather as if a human could go to an insect to get the necessary genetic coding to sprout wings or walk on ceilings. It means that from a genetic point of view bacteria have become a single superorganism—tiny, dispersed, but invincible.

They will live and thrive on almost anything you spill, dribble, or shake loose. Just give them a little moisture—as when you run a damp cloth over a counter—and they will bloom as if created from nothing. They will eat wood, the glue in wallpaper, the metals in hardened paint. Scientists in Australia found microbes known as Thiobacillus concretivorans that lived in—indeed, could not live without—concentrations of sulfuric acid strong enough to dissolve metal. A species called Micrococcus radiophilus was found living happily in the waste tanks of nuclear reactors, gorging itself on plutonium and whatever else was there. Some bacteria break down chemical materials from which, as far as we can tell, they gain no benefit at all.

They have been found living in boiling mud pots and lakes of caustic soda, deep inside rocks, at the bottom of the sea, in hidden pools of icy water in the McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica, and seven miles down in the Pacific Ocean where pressures are more than a thousand times greater than at the surface, or equivalent to being squashed beneath fifty jumbo jets. Some of them seem to be practically indestructible. Deinococcus radiodurans is, according to theEconomist , “almost immune to radioactivity.” Blast its DNA with radiation, and the pieces immediately reform “like the scuttling limbs of an undead creature from a horror movie.”

Perhaps the most extraordinary survival yet found was that of a Streptococcus bacterium that was recovered from the sealed lens of a camera that had stood on the Moon for two years. In short, there are few environments in which bacteria aren’t prepared to live. “They are finding now that when they push probes into ocean vents so hot that the probes actually start to melt, there are bacteria even there,” Victoria Bennett told me.

We now know that there are a lot of microbes living deep within the Earth, many of which have nothing at all to do with the organic world. They eat rocks or, rather, the stuff that’s in rocks—iron, sulfur, manganese, and so on. And they breathe odd things too—iron, chromium, cobalt, even uranium. Such processes may be instrumental in concentrating gold, copper, and other precious metals, and possibly deposits of oil and natural gas. It has even been suggested that their tireless nibblings created the Earth’s crust.

Some scientists now think that there could be as much as 100 trillion tons of bacteria living beneath our feet in what are known as subsurface lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystems—SLiME for short. Thomas Gold of Cornell has estimated that if you took all the bacteria out of the Earth’s interior and dumped it on the surface, it would cover the planet to a depth of five feet. If the estimates are correct, there could be more life under the Earth than on top of it.

At depth microbes shrink in size and become extremely sluggish. The liveliest of them may divide no more than once a century, some no more than perhaps once in five hundred years. As the Economist has put it: “The key to long life, it seems, is not to do too much.” When things are really tough, bacteria are prepared to shut down all systems and wait for better times. In 1997 scientists successfully activated some anthrax spores that had lain dormant for eighty years in a museum display in Trondheim, Norway. Other microorganisms have leapt back to life after being released from a 118-year-old can of meat and a 166-year-old bottle of beer. In 1996, scientists at the Russian Academy of Science claimed to have revived bacteria frozen in Siberian permafrost for three million years. But the record claim for durability so far is one made by Russell Vreeland and colleagues at West Chester University in Pennsylvania in 2000, when they announced that they had resuscitated 250-million-year-old bacteria called Bacillus permians that had been trapped in salt deposits two thousand feet underground in Carlsbad, New Mexico. If so, this microbe is older than the continents.

It is a natural human impulse to think of evolution as a long chain of improvements, of a never-ending advance toward largeness and complexity—in a word, toward us. We flatter ourselves. Most of the real diversity in evolution has been small-scale. We large things are just flukes—an interesting side branch. Of the twenty-three main divisions of life, only three—plants, animals, and fungi—are large enough to be seen by the human eye, and even they contain species that are microscopic. Indeed, according to Woese, if you totaled up all the biomass of the planet—every living thing, plants included—microbes would account for at least 80 percent of all there is, perhaps more. The world belongs to the very small—and it has for a very long time.

skrill meadow

esto no ocupa mediafire, por que es pay what you want. even 0

http://skrillmeadow.bandcamp.com/album/april-fools-day

y

http://skrillmeadow.bandcamp.com/album/hard-water

de miembros de lazer zeppelin. una joya.
get it now

Halcones, terrorismo de Estado

Documental sobre matanza de 10 de junio 1971 (jueves de corpus)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvLgdbmul_Q&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8M6pB2y6Co&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjDbymm1BUM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0w0d3ECCUks&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAfdl1M6FIk&feature=related

Highlights:

  • Los detalles de los asesinatos contados por testigos directos
  • Los relatos de los fotógrafos en la escena
  • Los vídeos inéditos de la NBC que evidencían la culpabilidad de los paramilitares y no de los estudiantes
  • La línea de investigación que vincula el reclutamiento de los grupos de choque con la CIA
  • Los documentos que incriminan al jefe de seguridad por la preparación del evento
  • El testimonio sobre el hecho de que Luis Echeverría, como primer acto como presidente en 1970, ordenó la creación de los grupos; así como más evidencia de su responsabilidad en Tlatelolco

archivo...

un fanzine que hice p. la clase de generos

http://www.mediafire.com/?inq06ss01rrfrcr

dated octubre 2009

sobre el caso megaupload

dicen en hipinion:

It bugs me that it fucked up a bunch of curated blogs, artists posting their own music, and all the other assorted rare material/mixes/etc that disappeared.

noz had some good comments on twitter that a lot of kids making music now aren't thinking about archiving for the future at all, and sites like this getting wiped out just accelerates the process of history disappearing. You more or less have to decide to destroy a physical recording/artifact, digital files will just naturally vanish into the aether if it isn't consciously maintained by someone and not all artists are into that.


y luego alguien responde

this is a problem i've been talking about. i'm worried about things that never had physical distribution or were never and will never be commercially released disappearing from time. demos, mixtapes and alternate/extended versions of songs have been the real joy of filesharing for me. i don't see the possibility of universal ever putting out a remastered version of casual's fear itself with the demos attached, for instance. or back when i had an mp3 blog, there are songs from back then that i may never find again already. it took me like a year recently to rediscover a gangster rap song i posted called "f.u." by j.r. i only got it again from someone who originally downloaded it from me and happened to still have it

the majority of the things i download are out of print or obscure and much of that segment is going to be wiped from the internet it feels like in the next couple weeks. considering the shrinking physical marketplace for albums, re-releasing obscure records that sold very little to begin with even digitally has got to be the lowest possible priority for major labels. i've noticed on soulseek that really obscure tracks are getting harder to find than when i originally downloaded them like ten years ago. regular, canonized albums will always be shared online in some way, they're easy to remember and catalog. it would just suck to lose the off-kilter shit


después aparece la abril

I've seen that this has been a problem for the local music scene here and probably will be a bigger problem in the future. People doing a three track demo and throwing it up on bandcamp & mediafire is great to get the music out there straight away but it tends to disappear into the void after a year or two. There's already threads about bands who, for example, put up a bunch of demos/live tracks or whatever on MySpace or even Bebo only two or three years ago which are now lost because they've closed the page after breaking up etc. Also, the entire foundation of live show recording & trading which I'm into in a big way rests on digital files being traded (there's usually never a physical copy excluding back ups etc) which already has lost a tonne of things over the last few years.


pero ese no es un buen argumento. como me acabo de dar cuenta hace unos días, los discos duros no son confiables. tenemos que empezar a tener el hábito de copiar todo a lo físico por que la información en internet tiene fecha de expiración.

totalmente

the gun club es the cramps, dave longstreth es david byrne, ofwgkta es wu tang, kreayshawn es fannypack, flight of the conchords es liam lynch, nicki minaj es lil kim, neko case es kristin hersh, calle 13 es manu chao. "losing my edge" es "instant club hit". ely guerra es pj harvey, richard hawley es scott walker, shakira era alanis morissette, "common people" es "los amantes", richard hawley es scott walker, medicine es mbv, bocafloja es mos def, vashti bunyan es joan baez, wilco es the mekons, bikini kill es the raincoats, sleater kinney the slits.

cuando uno no se parece a nadie, no es nadie

hoy vi un ovni

por fin. en tijuana

era una luz que se movía lentísimo hacia abajo hasta que al final desapareció

creo que nos vamos acercando

the original was so good

como que me dio due le ver cosas a veces

bueno, un clásico...



3 meses mas!

más sobre el oscurantismo tecnológico

http://www.tercerafuerzanacion.org/textos_bio_3.html


con un buen shout out a bruce sterling (quien me aclamó mi playlist en las pasadas conferencias de abril)

404 not found

Es increíble pero verdad: pronto viviremos una nueva edad media.


Sin registro ni nada; y no por que no queramos, sino por que se nos olvida registrarlo. No soy historiador ni pretendo acercarme a ese puesto pero la verdad es que este es un problema que no debe pertenecer a solo un sector exclusivo.

Mientras que vemos, hacemos y seguimos consumiendo medios, al mismo tiempo deberíamos estar conservándolos. Ese es mi gran problema con usar grooveshark, youtube, etc. etc. Me encanta pero al mismo tiempo no puedo al menos no darle un click en "favorito" para despues tratar de recuperar ese archivo, así como no puedo escuchar una canción y al menos no tenerla en cualquier formato posible.

Es nuestra historia. Así está siendo preservada. Y no podemos seguir pensando que la nube dura para siempre. Un ejemplo: ver la forma en que se lee este foro. Es de hace solo 3 años. Y ya se encuentra archivada de tal manera que parece salida de 1995 (incluyendo los links super rotos). A este paso esa entrada va a ser borrada en unos 2 años mas máximo.

Yo sé que puede sonar como una estupidez pero es solo un ejemplo. Piensa en las cosas que son guardadas ahora en discos duros para longevidad. Es nuestro último recurso de preservación. Un disco duro. Un disco duro que en unas décadas más va a volverse obsoleto siguiendole la huella a sus otros compañeros. O quien me puede decir donde puedo leer mi floppy?

Es la verdad. Y todavía creemos que esas mierdas no confiables nos van a respaldar la información.

Hoy tuve la gran y terrible desgracia de ser víctima de un disco duro vale madre. Mientras comenzaba a continuar de editar mi trabajo del documental san pedro se me cayó, y ya. Olvídate san pedro. 6 horas despues y un chingo de remedios populares, y lo unico que logré recuperar fueron unos cuantos .fcps y unos flacs de shows en vivo que tenía muy atesorados. Ni pedo. Me mega apendejé. Pero apoco si se te cae un cd ya vale cake? o una hoja de papel? Odio los pinches bits ojalá se mueran.

Y lo más chistoso es que sí se van a morir. Guardes donde los guardes.

yearly thoughts on coachella lineup:

jeff mangum, pulp, mazzy star

por fin

todo lo que tengo que decir.

so good

Teaser de ¡Basura!

¡Basura! - Teaser from carlos matsuo on Vimeo.



Documental sobre la banda San Pedro El Cortez, las drogas, la escena, las prisiones políticas, el reciclaje, y Tijuana.

no se

por que decidí ver tantas cosas culeras en la ultima hora.. pero bueno

dejo lo mas light, pero perturbador en muchos sentidos. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8119201.stm (no buscar video)



queremos los sueños!

Amazon supports internet sales tax bill

Amazon.com, the most vociferous opponent of collecting sales tax on purchases shipped outside its home state of Washington, has had a change of heart in the wake of today's new Senate tax bill, the Marketplace Fairness Act.

"Amazon strongly supports enactment of the Enzi-Durbin-Alexander bill and will work with Congress, retailers, and the states to get this bi-partisan legislation passed," said Paul Misener, Amazon vice president, global public policy, in a press release. "It's a win-win resolution—and as analysts have noted, Amazon offers customers the best prices with or without sales tax."

The states get the taxes, of course—but what does Amazon get? Only a few months ago, Amazon was slamming states like California that attempted to have the Internet retailer collect and pay sales tax on purchases shipped into the state (under the theory that Amazon "affiliates" constituted a "physical nexus" in California and thus made Amazon liable for collection duties).

"We oppose this bill because it is unconstitutional and counterproductive. It is supported by big-box retailers, most of which are based outside California, that seek to harm the affiliate advertising programs of their competitors," Amazon wrote in a letter this summer. "Similar legislation in other states has led to job and income losses, and little, if any, new tax revenue. We deeply regret that we must take this action."

The company then dumped its Golden State affiliates, as it has in other states that passed similar laws.

But Amazon boss Jeff Bezos has in the past opened the door for sales tax collection—so long as the scheme applied broadly and on a simplified basis. The new legislation would apply nationally, allowing states to apply their sales tax regime to all retailers but only on the condition that they dramatically streamline the taxing process.

Sales tax could only be required by states "pursuant to the provisions of the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement" or a similar alternative. SSUTA is a group set up in 1999 by state governors and legislatures that has attempted to simplify sales tax schemes across the country and to create simplified means of reporting and paying the taxes. It has had real success; 24 states have currently adopted the Agreement.


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/surprise-amazon-strongly-supports-new-sales-tax-bill.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss

ciudad juarez

no me chingues

Imagine you are riding comfortably on a sleek train. You look out the window and see that the tracks end abruptly not too far ahead ... The train will derail if it continues. You suggest the train stop immediately and the passengers go forward on foot. This will require a major shift in everyone’s way of traveling, of course, but you see it as the only realistic option. To continue barreling forward is to court catastrophic consequences. But when you propose this course of action, others – who have grown comfortable riding on the train – say, “We like the train, and arguing that we should get off is not realistic.”

OCCUPY TIJUANA

u

h shit

mangum en wall street

Watch live streaming video from globalrevolution at livestream.com


suer-tudos

Sobre El Queso Y Los Gusanos de Carlo Ginzburg

Este es un ensayo que no pensaba publicar pero alguien me lo pidió :)

La historia de Menocchio es una sobre una vida campesina de relativa oscuridad, pero también una sobre extrañas y poderosas ideas; confusas y hasta mal concebidas, pero suficientemente provocadoras como para llevarlo hasta el conflicto con la inquisición y al final a las llamas del purgatorio.

Tristemente, a los inquisidores no les gustó la idea de que Dios podría haber comenzado como un gusano y que el mundo era nada más que una masa de caos. Una lástima por que es una buena teoría del génesis.

Pero esto sirve de ejemplo del tiempo y sus incongruencias; como dice en una de las páginas: “cien o ciento cincuenta años mas tarde, probablemente Menocchio habría sido recluido a un hospital para locos- por afección de delirio religioso- pero en plena contrarreforma las modalidades represivas eran distintas…” cosa que me hace pensar en el discurso clave sobre la legalidad de Midnight Express: “¿Qué es un crimen? ¿Qué es un castigo? Parece que varía de tiempo en tiempo y de lugar en lugar. Lo que es legal hoy de repente es ilegal mañana por que todos se ponen de acuerdo, y lo que era ilegal ayer ya no lo es hoy por que todo el mundo lo está haciendo…”. Usando la misma lógica, en el caso de Menocchio, su situación fue una de solo mala suerte.

Aunque una vista con un toque de optimismo. Lo primero que pensé mientras leía El Molinero fue en Candido de Voltaire. Pues es que al pobre de Candido le pasan cosas cada vez mas atroces, y él sigue afirmando que “todo es para el bien” o algo por el estilo. La diferencia es que Candido es ficción. Pero es muy parecido; para nosotros Menocchio, el hereje se convierte en el héroe por nuestra capacidad de ver el optimismo. Todos somos la representación de Candido reflejados en Menocchio. Entonces puede ser que optimismo = ignorancia? Por que qué significa que en un libro donde la víctima es alguien que malinterpretó libros “sagrados” por su propia falta de cultura sea de quien nos debamos compadecer? Si para hacer esta reflexión me tengo que alejar de mi propia cultura. Soy una persona Universitaria, del siglo XXI, residente de una ciudad que limita con el país mas poderoso del mundo (falsedad, pero sigamos el rollo), esto me pone en una posición y aunque yo personalmente no lo quiera hacer, es algo que me hace comportarme diferente hacia las personas que no estudiaron, no son de este siglo, no son residentes de esta ciudad, y no mantienen los mismos circulos que yo, a.k.a. un campesino. Y como yo existe toda una generación. Que al leer el libro y querer compadecerse, simplemente no puede por que un Menocchio le está viendo desde la ventana y al mismo tiempo lo rechaza.

Nuestra ventaja es nuestra educación, la que hace que leamos de cierta forma, que veamos de cierta manera y hasta analicemos bajo rubros determinados. Nuestra ventaja es nuestra desventaja. Nos cegamos a lo que no es conocido. Somos caballos viendo solo hacia enfrente. Comunicólogos pensando como doctores.

David Foster Wallace dice en Hail to the Returning Dragon que durante las 2 últimas décadas del siglo XX, cuando apareció el VIH, vimos el sexo como emocionante otra vez. Que la seguridad de que nada pasara nos había convertido en zombies antes de esto. Que después de los 60 y su revolución sexual todo se había vuelto aburrido. Entonces llegó el sida e hizo todo prohibido otra vez. Antojable. Dice que es como el dragón que cuida el castillo que tiene a una princesa prisionera. La historia no fuera nada si el dragón no estuviera, y ciertamente la recompensa no tan satisfactoria. Elegantemente puesto, el sida es vencer a ese dragón. Entonces no es tan malo salirse de los parámetros que nos mantienen viendo cuadradamente. Lo que lo hace peligroso lo hace especial.

Aunque en este libro no puedo decir que me fascinó completamente la situación del personaje, creo que por que a la mitad ya sentía que lo había escuchado en palabras de cualquier loco que ande por la calle. En todo caso, estaba esperando mas historia y menos teoría. Especialmente por lo que había escuchado sobre como era un buen ejemplo de contar una historia importante sin mas que un analisis cercano a un personaje. Ginzburg habla un poco de esto en el prefacio, y suena interesante y con ideas razonadas, solo esperaba que hubiera mas sobre como las tradiciones orales combinadas con la literatura burguesa habían producido estos ideales en Menocchio.

Pero no estoy diciendo que fuera malo, fue un excelente punto de vista, y uno que me abrió los ojos sobre cosas que nunca había pensado. Como algún buen standup de Bill Hicks, o un album de Misfits.

El análisis microhistórico en El Queso Y Los Gusanos, como todo microclima o realidad alterna, es una vista interesante al mundo del proto-anarquismo del siglo XVI. Olvidemos a Jello Biafra, a Crass y a Bill Hicks, aquí esta Menocchio.

hard hat riot

in light of recent adbusters movements...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Hat_Riot